PTBP Web Desk
The Special Central Judge Shah Rukh Arjumand has rejected the acquittal pleas of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in the Toshakhana-II case. This ruling was announced in court, setting the stage for their indictment on Monday, November 18.
Rejection of Acquittal Pleas: The court had previously reserved its verdict on the pleas filed by Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. After considering arguments from both sides, Judge Arjumand decided against acquitting the couple, indicating that the legal proceedings against them would continue.
Indictment Scheduled: Following the rejection, the couple is now slated to be formally charged in the Toshakhana-II case, marking a critical step in the legal process.
FIA’s Challenge: The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had previously challenged Bushra Bibi’s bail in the Supreme Court, arguing that the procedure followed for granting bail in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) was irregular. According to the FIA, the bail was granted in the judge’s chamber, which they claim contravened Supreme Court guidelines.
Bail Granted Earlier: Despite the FIA’s objections, the IHC had earlier granted post-arrest bail to Bushra Bibi on the condition of Rs1 million surety bonds. This decision was made by IHC Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, who also ordered her immediate release.
Case Details: The Toshakhana-II case revolves around allegations of misusing gifts received from foreign dignitaries, which were supposed to be deposited in the state treasury but were reportedly retained by the former Prime Minister and his spouse.
Arrest and Acquittals: Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi faced arrest on July 13 in connection with this case. Interestingly, their arrest came right after their acquittal in another high-profile case, the Iddat case, where they were initially sentenced to seven years imprisonment for what was deemed a fraudulent nikah (marriage contract).
Political Repercussions: As the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan’s legal troubles could influence the political landscape, especially considering his significant following and the public’s interest in his political fate.
Legal Precedents: These cases test the limits of legal accountability for high-ranking officials in Pakistan, potentially setting precedents for how political figures are held accountable for their actions.
Public Sentiment: The cases against Imran Khan have garnered mixed reactions from the public, with his supporters decrying what they perceive as political victimization, while critics argue for the enforcement of law without exception.
International Attention: Given Imran Khan’s international profile, these legal developments also draw attention from global observers, impacting Pakistan’s image regarding rule of law and political stability.
Indictment and Trial: With the indictment looming, the next steps will involve a detailed examination of the charges against Khan and his wife. The trial will likely be closely watched for its fairness and the evidence presented.
Potential Appeals: Given the complexity of the cases and the high stakes involved, further legal challenges or appeals seem probable, possibly escalating to higher courts.
